Comparison

Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.5

GPT-5.5 costs 50% less per input token than Claude Fable 5. On generated (output) tokens, Claude Fable 5 costs 40% more than GPT-5.5. GPT-5.5 accepts more context per request than Claude Fable 5.

FieldClaude Fable 5
GPT-5.5
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Context window1M1.1M
Max output128K128K
Input / 1M$10.00$5.0050% cheaper
Output / 1M$50.00$30.0040% cheaper
Cached input / 1M$1.00$0.5050% cheaper
Batch discount50%50%
Release date2026-06-092026-04-23

Worked cost examples

Estimated monthly cost on three common usage shapes

WorkloadClaude Fable 5GPT-5.5

Chatbot

800 input / 200 output tokens per request, 100,000 requests/month

$1,800$1,000cheaper

RAG pipeline

6,000 input / 700 output tokens per request, 30,000 requests/month

$2,850$1,530cheaper

Batch summarization

20,000 input / 1,500 output tokens per request, 5,000 requests/month

$1,375$725.00cheaper

Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.5 FAQ

Is Claude Fable 5 cheaper than GPT-5.5?
Claude Fable 5 costs $10.00 per 1M input tokens versus $5.00 for GPT-5.5 — GPT-5.5 is 100% cheaper per input token.
Which is cheaper for output tokens, Claude Fable 5 or GPT-5.5?
Claude Fable 5 charges $50.00 per 1M output tokens; GPT-5.5 charges $30.00 per 1M output tokens.
Which has the larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or GPT-5.5?
GPT-5.5 does, with a 1,050,000-token context window.
Do Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.5 offer cache pricing?
Claude Fable 5 discounts cached input to $1.00 per 1M tokens. GPT-5.5 discounts cached input to $0.50 per 1M tokens.

Looking for another matchup? See all comparisons.