Comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash

Claude Haiku 4.5 charges 86% more per input token than DeepSeek V4 Flash. On generated (output) tokens, Claude Haiku 4.5 costs 94% more than DeepSeek V4 Flash. DeepSeek V4 Flash accepts more context per request than Claude Haiku 4.5.

FieldClaude Haiku 4.5
DeepSeek V4 Flash
ProviderAnthropicDeepSeek
Context window200K1M
Max output64K384K
Input / 1M$1.00$0.1486% cheaper
Output / 1M$5.00$0.2894% cheaper
Cached input / 1M$0.10$0.002897% cheaper
Batch discount50%
Release date2025-10-01

Worked cost examples

Estimated monthly cost on three common usage shapes

WorkloadClaude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek V4 Flash

Chatbot

800 input / 200 output tokens per request, 100,000 requests/month

$180.00$16.80cheaper

RAG pipeline

6,000 input / 700 output tokens per request, 30,000 requests/month

$285.00$31.08cheaper

Batch summarization

20,000 input / 1,500 output tokens per request, 5,000 requests/month

$137.50$16.10cheaper

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash FAQ

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash?
Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.00 per 1M input tokens versus $0.14 for DeepSeek V4 Flash — DeepSeek V4 Flash is 614% cheaper per input token.
Which is cheaper for output tokens, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Flash?
Claude Haiku 4.5 charges $5.00 per 1M output tokens; DeepSeek V4 Flash charges $0.28 per 1M output tokens.
Which has the larger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Flash?
DeepSeek V4 Flash does, with a 1,000,000-token context window.
Do Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek V4 Flash offer cache pricing?
Claude Haiku 4.5 discounts cached input to $0.10 per 1M tokens. DeepSeek V4 Flash discounts cached input to $0.0028 per 1M tokens.

Looking for another matchup? See all comparisons.