Comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Llama 4 Maverick

Per input token, Llama 4 Maverick runs 85% cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5. Llama 4 Maverick is 88% cheaper on output tokens. Llama 4 Maverick has the larger context window than Claude Haiku 4.5. Claude Haiku 4.5 offers a cheaper cached-input tier for repeated context.

FieldClaude Haiku 4.5
Llama 4 Maverick
ProviderAnthropicMeta
Context window200K1M
Max output64K
Input / 1M$1.00$0.1585% cheaper
Output / 1M$5.00$0.6088% cheaper
Cached input / 1M$0.10
Batch discount50%
Release date2025-10-01

Worked cost examples

Estimated monthly cost on three common usage shapes

WorkloadClaude Haiku 4.5Llama 4 Maverick

Chatbot

800 input / 200 output tokens per request, 100,000 requests/month

$180.00$24.00cheaper

RAG pipeline

6,000 input / 700 output tokens per request, 30,000 requests/month

$285.00$39.60cheaper

Batch summarization

20,000 input / 1,500 output tokens per request, 5,000 requests/month

$137.50$19.50cheaper

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Llama 4 Maverick FAQ

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 cheaper than Llama 4 Maverick?
Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.00 per 1M input tokens versus $0.15 for Llama 4 Maverick — Llama 4 Maverick is 567% cheaper per input token.
Which is cheaper for output tokens, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Llama 4 Maverick?
Claude Haiku 4.5 charges $5.00 per 1M output tokens; Llama 4 Maverick charges $0.60 per 1M output tokens.
Which has the larger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Llama 4 Maverick?
Llama 4 Maverick does, with a 1,000,000-token context window.
Do Claude Haiku 4.5 and Llama 4 Maverick offer cache pricing?
Claude Haiku 4.5 discounts cached input to $0.10 per 1M tokens. Llama 4 Maverick has no documented cache discount.

Looking for another matchup? See all comparisons.