Comparison

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash

Gemini 3.5 Flash costs 70% less per input token than Claude Opus 4.8. On generated (output) tokens, Claude Opus 4.8 costs 64% more than Gemini 3.5 Flash. Gemini 3.5 Flash accepts more context per request than Claude Opus 4.8.

FieldClaude Opus 4.8
Gemini 3.5 Flash
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Context window1M1M
Max output128K65.5K
Input / 1M$5.00$1.5070% cheaper
Output / 1M$25.00$9.0064% cheaper
Cached input / 1M$0.50$0.1570% cheaper
Batch discount50%50%
Release date

Worked cost examples

Estimated monthly cost on three common usage shapes

WorkloadClaude Opus 4.8Gemini 3.5 Flash

Chatbot

800 input / 200 output tokens per request, 100,000 requests/month

$900.00$300.00cheaper

RAG pipeline

6,000 input / 700 output tokens per request, 30,000 requests/month

$1,425$459.00cheaper

Batch summarization

20,000 input / 1,500 output tokens per request, 5,000 requests/month

$687.50$217.50cheaper

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash FAQ

Is Claude Opus 4.8 cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash?
Claude Opus 4.8 costs $5.00 per 1M input tokens versus $1.50 for Gemini 3.5 Flash — Gemini 3.5 Flash is 233% cheaper per input token.
Which is cheaper for output tokens, Claude Opus 4.8 or Gemini 3.5 Flash?
Claude Opus 4.8 charges $25.00 per 1M output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash charges $9.00 per 1M output tokens.
Which has the larger context window, Claude Opus 4.8 or Gemini 3.5 Flash?
Gemini 3.5 Flash does, with a 1,048,576-token context window.
Do Claude Opus 4.8 and Gemini 3.5 Flash offer cache pricing?
Claude Opus 4.8 discounts cached input to $0.50 per 1M tokens. Gemini 3.5 Flash discounts cached input to $0.15 per 1M tokens.

Looking for another matchup? See all comparisons.