Comparison

Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.5

Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.5 charge the same per input token. On generated (output) tokens, GPT-5.5 costs 17% more than Claude Opus 4.8. GPT-5.5 has the larger context window than Claude Opus 4.8.

FieldClaude Opus 4.8
GPT-5.5
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Context window1M1.1M
Max output128K128K
Input / 1M$5.00$5.00
Output / 1M$25.0017% cheaper$30.00
Cached input / 1M$0.50$0.50
Batch discount50%50%
Release date2026-04-23

Worked cost examples

Estimated monthly cost on three common usage shapes

WorkloadClaude Opus 4.8GPT-5.5

Chatbot

800 input / 200 output tokens per request, 100,000 requests/month

$900.00cheaper$1,000

RAG pipeline

6,000 input / 700 output tokens per request, 30,000 requests/month

$1,425cheaper$1,530

Batch summarization

20,000 input / 1,500 output tokens per request, 5,000 requests/month

$687.50cheaper$725.00

Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.5 FAQ

Is Claude Opus 4.8 cheaper than GPT-5.5?
Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.5 cost the same per input token: $5.00 per 1M tokens.
Which is cheaper for output tokens, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.5?
Claude Opus 4.8 charges $25.00 per 1M output tokens; GPT-5.5 charges $30.00 per 1M output tokens.
Which has the larger context window, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.5?
GPT-5.5 does, with a 1,050,000-token context window.
Do Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.5 offer cache pricing?
Claude Opus 4.8 discounts cached input to $0.50 per 1M tokens. GPT-5.5 discounts cached input to $0.50 per 1M tokens.

Looking for another matchup? See all comparisons.