Comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Gemini 3.5 Flash

Per input token, DeepSeek V4 Flash runs 91% cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash. On generated (output) tokens, Gemini 3.5 Flash costs 97% more than DeepSeek V4 Flash. Gemini 3.5 Flash accepts more context per request than DeepSeek V4 Flash.

FieldDeepSeek V4 Flash
Gemini 3.5 Flash
ProviderDeepSeekGoogle
Context window1M1M
Max output384K65.5K
Input / 1M$0.1491% cheaper$1.50
Output / 1M$0.2897% cheaper$9.00
Cached input / 1M$0.002898% cheaper$0.15
Batch discount50%
Release date

Worked cost examples

Estimated monthly cost on three common usage shapes

WorkloadDeepSeek V4 FlashGemini 3.5 Flash

Chatbot

800 input / 200 output tokens per request, 100,000 requests/month

$16.80cheaper$300.00

RAG pipeline

6,000 input / 700 output tokens per request, 30,000 requests/month

$31.08cheaper$459.00

Batch summarization

20,000 input / 1,500 output tokens per request, 5,000 requests/month

$16.10cheaper$217.50

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Gemini 3.5 Flash FAQ

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash?
DeepSeek V4 Flash costs $0.14 per 1M input tokens versus $1.50 for Gemini 3.5 Flash — DeepSeek V4 Flash is 91% cheaper per input token.
Which is cheaper for output tokens, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Gemini 3.5 Flash?
DeepSeek V4 Flash charges $0.28 per 1M output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash charges $9.00 per 1M output tokens.
Which has the larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Gemini 3.5 Flash?
Gemini 3.5 Flash does, with a 1,048,576-token context window.
Do DeepSeek V4 Flash and Gemini 3.5 Flash offer cache pricing?
DeepSeek V4 Flash discounts cached input to $0.0028 per 1M tokens. Gemini 3.5 Flash discounts cached input to $0.15 per 1M tokens.

Looking for another matchup? See all comparisons.