Comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Llama 4 Maverick

Per input token, DeepSeek V4 Flash runs 7% cheaper than Llama 4 Maverick. DeepSeek V4 Flash is 53% cheaper on output tokens. DeepSeek V4 Flash offers a cheaper cached-input tier for repeated context.

FieldDeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
ProviderDeepSeekMeta
Context window1M1M
Max output384K
Input / 1M$0.147% cheaper$0.15
Output / 1M$0.2853% cheaper$0.60
Cached input / 1M$0.0028
Batch discount
Release date

Worked cost examples

Estimated monthly cost on three common usage shapes

WorkloadDeepSeek V4 FlashLlama 4 Maverick

Chatbot

800 input / 200 output tokens per request, 100,000 requests/month

$16.80cheaper$24.00

RAG pipeline

6,000 input / 700 output tokens per request, 30,000 requests/month

$31.08cheaper$39.60

Batch summarization

20,000 input / 1,500 output tokens per request, 5,000 requests/month

$16.10cheaper$19.50

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Llama 4 Maverick FAQ

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash cheaper than Llama 4 Maverick?
DeepSeek V4 Flash costs $0.14 per 1M input tokens versus $0.15 for Llama 4 Maverick — DeepSeek V4 Flash is 7% cheaper per input token.
Which is cheaper for output tokens, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Llama 4 Maverick?
DeepSeek V4 Flash charges $0.28 per 1M output tokens; Llama 4 Maverick charges $0.60 per 1M output tokens.
Which has the larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Llama 4 Maverick?
DeepSeek V4 Flash does, with a 1,000,000-token context window.
Do DeepSeek V4 Flash and Llama 4 Maverick offer cache pricing?
DeepSeek V4 Flash discounts cached input to $0.0028 per 1M tokens. Llama 4 Maverick has no documented cache discount.

Looking for another matchup? See all comparisons.