Comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Llama 4 Scout

Per input token, Llama 4 Scout runs 29% cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash. On generated (output) tokens, Llama 4 Scout costs 7% more than DeepSeek V4 Flash. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window than DeepSeek V4 Flash. DeepSeek V4 Flash offers a cheaper cached-input tier for repeated context.

FieldDeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Scout
ProviderDeepSeekMeta
Context window1M10M
Max output384K
Input / 1M$0.14$0.1029% cheaper
Output / 1M$0.287% cheaper$0.30
Cached input / 1M$0.0028
Batch discount
Release date2025-04-05

Worked cost examples

Estimated monthly cost on three common usage shapes

WorkloadDeepSeek V4 FlashLlama 4 Scout

Chatbot

800 input / 200 output tokens per request, 100,000 requests/month

$16.80$14.00cheaper

RAG pipeline

6,000 input / 700 output tokens per request, 30,000 requests/month

$31.08$24.30cheaper

Batch summarization

20,000 input / 1,500 output tokens per request, 5,000 requests/month

$16.10$12.25cheaper

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Llama 4 Scout FAQ

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash cheaper than Llama 4 Scout?
DeepSeek V4 Flash costs $0.14 per 1M input tokens versus $0.10 for Llama 4 Scout — Llama 4 Scout is 40% cheaper per input token.
Which is cheaper for output tokens, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Llama 4 Scout?
DeepSeek V4 Flash charges $0.28 per 1M output tokens; Llama 4 Scout charges $0.30 per 1M output tokens.
Which has the larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout does, with a 10,000,000-token context window.
Do DeepSeek V4 Flash and Llama 4 Scout offer cache pricing?
DeepSeek V4 Flash discounts cached input to $0.0028 per 1M tokens. Llama 4 Scout has no documented cache discount.

Looking for another matchup? See all comparisons.