Comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Mistral Large 3

Per input token, DeepSeek V4 Flash runs 72% cheaper than Mistral Large 3. On generated (output) tokens, Mistral Large 3 costs 81% more than DeepSeek V4 Flash. DeepSeek V4 Flash also discounts cached input reads.

FieldDeepSeek V4 Flash
Mistral Large 3
ProviderDeepSeekMistral AI
Context window1M
Max output384K
Input / 1M$0.1472% cheaper$0.50
Output / 1M$0.2881% cheaper$1.50
Cached input / 1M$0.0028
Batch discount50%
Release date

Worked cost examples

Estimated monthly cost on three common usage shapes

WorkloadDeepSeek V4 FlashMistral Large 3

Chatbot

800 input / 200 output tokens per request, 100,000 requests/month

$16.80cheaper$70.00

RAG pipeline

6,000 input / 700 output tokens per request, 30,000 requests/month

$31.08cheaper$121.50

Batch summarization

20,000 input / 1,500 output tokens per request, 5,000 requests/month

$16.10cheaper$61.25

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Mistral Large 3 FAQ

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash cheaper than Mistral Large 3?
DeepSeek V4 Flash costs $0.14 per 1M input tokens versus $0.50 for Mistral Large 3 — DeepSeek V4 Flash is 72% cheaper per input token.
Which is cheaper for output tokens, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Mistral Large 3?
DeepSeek V4 Flash charges $0.28 per 1M output tokens; Mistral Large 3 charges $1.50 per 1M output tokens.
Do DeepSeek V4 Flash and Mistral Large 3 offer cache pricing?
DeepSeek V4 Flash discounts cached input to $0.0028 per 1M tokens. Mistral Large 3 has no documented cache discount.

Looking for another matchup? See all comparisons.