Comparison
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Llama 4 Scout
Per input token, Llama 4 Scout runs 77% cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Pro. On generated (output) tokens, DeepSeek V4 Pro costs 66% more than Llama 4 Scout. Llama 4 Scout accepts more context per request than DeepSeek V4 Pro. DeepSeek V4 Pro also discounts cached input reads.
| Field | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Meta |
| Context window | 1M | 10M |
| Max output | 384K | — |
| Input / 1M | $0.435 | $0.1077% cheaper |
| Output / 1M | $0.87 | $0.3066% cheaper |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.0036 | — |
| Batch discount | — | — |
| Release date | — | 2025-04-05 |
Worked cost examples
Estimated monthly cost on three common usage shapes
| Workload | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
Chatbot 800 input / 200 output tokens per request, 100,000 requests/month | $52.20 | $14.00cheaper |
RAG pipeline 6,000 input / 700 output tokens per request, 30,000 requests/month | $96.57 | $24.30cheaper |
Batch summarization 20,000 input / 1,500 output tokens per request, 5,000 requests/month | $50.03 | $12.25cheaper |
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Llama 4 Scout FAQ
- Is DeepSeek V4 Pro cheaper than Llama 4 Scout?
- DeepSeek V4 Pro costs $0.435 per 1M input tokens versus $0.10 for Llama 4 Scout — Llama 4 Scout is 335% cheaper per input token.
- Which is cheaper for output tokens, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Llama 4 Scout?
- DeepSeek V4 Pro charges $0.87 per 1M output tokens; Llama 4 Scout charges $0.30 per 1M output tokens.
- Which has the larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Llama 4 Scout?
- Llama 4 Scout does, with a 10,000,000-token context window.
- Do DeepSeek V4 Pro and Llama 4 Scout offer cache pricing?
- DeepSeek V4 Pro discounts cached input to $0.0036 per 1M tokens. Llama 4 Scout has no documented cache discount.
Looking for another matchup? See all comparisons.