Comparison

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs GPT-4o

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs 96% less per input token than GPT-4o. On generated (output) tokens, GPT-4o costs 96% more than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite.

FieldGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
GPT-4o
Legacy
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Context window128K
Max output
Input / 1M$0.1096% cheaper$2.50
Output / 1M$0.4096% cheaper$10.00
Cached input / 1M$0.0199% cheaper$1.25
Batch discount50%
Release date

Worked cost examples

Estimated monthly cost on three common usage shapes

WorkloadGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGPT-4o

Chatbot

800 input / 200 output tokens per request, 100,000 requests/month

$16.00cheaper$400.00

RAG pipeline

6,000 input / 700 output tokens per request, 30,000 requests/month

$26.40cheaper$660.00

Batch summarization

20,000 input / 1,500 output tokens per request, 5,000 requests/month

$13.00cheaper$325.00

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs GPT-4o FAQ

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite cheaper than GPT-4o?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs $0.10 per 1M input tokens versus $2.50 for GPT-4o — Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is 96% cheaper per input token.
Which is cheaper for output tokens, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or GPT-4o?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite charges $0.40 per 1M output tokens; GPT-4o charges $10.00 per 1M output tokens.
Do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and GPT-4o offer cache pricing?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite discounts cached input to $0.01 per 1M tokens. GPT-4o discounts cached input to $1.25 per 1M tokens.

Looking for another matchup? See all comparisons.