Comparison

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Llama 4 Maverick

Per input token, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite runs 33% cheaper than Llama 4 Maverick. On generated (output) tokens, Llama 4 Maverick costs 33% more than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite offers a cheaper cached-input tier for repeated context.

FieldGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Llama 4 Maverick
ProviderGoogleMeta
Context window1M
Max output
Input / 1M$0.1033% cheaper$0.15
Output / 1M$0.4033% cheaper$0.60
Cached input / 1M$0.01
Batch discount50%
Release date

Worked cost examples

Estimated monthly cost on three common usage shapes

WorkloadGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteLlama 4 Maverick

Chatbot

800 input / 200 output tokens per request, 100,000 requests/month

$16.00cheaper$24.00

RAG pipeline

6,000 input / 700 output tokens per request, 30,000 requests/month

$26.40cheaper$39.60

Batch summarization

20,000 input / 1,500 output tokens per request, 5,000 requests/month

$13.00cheaper$19.50

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Llama 4 Maverick FAQ

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite cheaper than Llama 4 Maverick?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs $0.10 per 1M input tokens versus $0.15 for Llama 4 Maverick — Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is 33% cheaper per input token.
Which is cheaper for output tokens, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Llama 4 Maverick?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite charges $0.40 per 1M output tokens; Llama 4 Maverick charges $0.60 per 1M output tokens.
Do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Llama 4 Maverick offer cache pricing?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite discounts cached input to $0.01 per 1M tokens. Llama 4 Maverick has no documented cache discount.

Looking for another matchup? See all comparisons.