Comparison

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Llama 4 Scout

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Llama 4 Scout charge the same per input token. Llama 4 Scout is 25% cheaper on output tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite offers a cheaper cached-input tier for repeated context.

FieldGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Llama 4 Scout
ProviderGoogleMeta
Context window10M
Max output
Input / 1M$0.10$0.10
Output / 1M$0.40$0.3025% cheaper
Cached input / 1M$0.01
Batch discount50%
Release date2025-04-05

Worked cost examples

Estimated monthly cost on three common usage shapes

WorkloadGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteLlama 4 Scout

Chatbot

800 input / 200 output tokens per request, 100,000 requests/month

$16.00$14.00cheaper

RAG pipeline

6,000 input / 700 output tokens per request, 30,000 requests/month

$26.40$24.30cheaper

Batch summarization

20,000 input / 1,500 output tokens per request, 5,000 requests/month

$13.00$12.25cheaper

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Llama 4 Scout FAQ

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite cheaper than Llama 4 Scout?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Llama 4 Scout cost the same per input token: $0.10 per 1M tokens.
Which is cheaper for output tokens, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Llama 4 Scout?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite charges $0.40 per 1M output tokens; Llama 4 Scout charges $0.30 per 1M output tokens.
Do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Llama 4 Scout offer cache pricing?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite discounts cached input to $0.01 per 1M tokens. Llama 4 Scout has no documented cache discount.

Looking for another matchup? See all comparisons.