Comparison

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Mistral Small 4

Mistral Small 4 charges 33% more per input token than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is 33% cheaper on output tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite offers a cheaper cached-input tier for repeated context.

FieldGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Mistral Small 4
ProviderGoogleMistral AI
Context window
Max output
Input / 1M$0.1033% cheaper$0.15
Output / 1M$0.4033% cheaper$0.60
Cached input / 1M$0.01
Batch discount50%50%
Release date

Worked cost examples

Estimated monthly cost on three common usage shapes

WorkloadGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteMistral Small 4

Chatbot

800 input / 200 output tokens per request, 100,000 requests/month

$16.00cheaper$24.00

RAG pipeline

6,000 input / 700 output tokens per request, 30,000 requests/month

$26.40cheaper$39.60

Batch summarization

20,000 input / 1,500 output tokens per request, 5,000 requests/month

$13.00cheaper$19.50

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Mistral Small 4 FAQ

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite cheaper than Mistral Small 4?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs $0.10 per 1M input tokens versus $0.15 for Mistral Small 4 — Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is 33% cheaper per input token.
Which is cheaper for output tokens, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Mistral Small 4?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite charges $0.40 per 1M output tokens; Mistral Small 4 charges $0.60 per 1M output tokens.
Do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Mistral Small 4 offer cache pricing?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite discounts cached input to $0.01 per 1M tokens. Mistral Small 4 has no documented cache discount.

Looking for another matchup? See all comparisons.