Comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Llama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Maverick costs 90% less per input token than Gemini 3.5 Flash. Output pricing favors Llama 4 Maverick, 93% less per token than Gemini 3.5 Flash. Gemini 3.5 Flash has the larger context window than Llama 4 Maverick. Gemini 3.5 Flash offers a cheaper cached-input tier for repeated context.

FieldGemini 3.5 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
ProviderGoogleMeta
Context window1M1M
Max output65.5K
Input / 1M$1.50$0.1590% cheaper
Output / 1M$9.00$0.6093% cheaper
Cached input / 1M$0.15
Batch discount50%
Release date

Worked cost examples

Estimated monthly cost on three common usage shapes

WorkloadGemini 3.5 FlashLlama 4 Maverick

Chatbot

800 input / 200 output tokens per request, 100,000 requests/month

$300.00$24.00cheaper

RAG pipeline

6,000 input / 700 output tokens per request, 30,000 requests/month

$459.00$39.60cheaper

Batch summarization

20,000 input / 1,500 output tokens per request, 5,000 requests/month

$217.50$19.50cheaper

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Llama 4 Maverick FAQ

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash cheaper than Llama 4 Maverick?
Gemini 3.5 Flash costs $1.50 per 1M input tokens versus $0.15 for Llama 4 Maverick — Llama 4 Maverick is 900% cheaper per input token.
Which is cheaper for output tokens, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Llama 4 Maverick?
Gemini 3.5 Flash charges $9.00 per 1M output tokens; Llama 4 Maverick charges $0.60 per 1M output tokens.
Which has the larger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Llama 4 Maverick?
Gemini 3.5 Flash does, with a 1,048,576-token context window.
Do Gemini 3.5 Flash and Llama 4 Maverick offer cache pricing?
Gemini 3.5 Flash discounts cached input to $0.15 per 1M tokens. Llama 4 Maverick has no documented cache discount.

Looking for another matchup? See all comparisons.