Comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Llama 4 Scout
Per input token, Llama 4 Scout runs 93% cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash. Output pricing favors Llama 4 Scout, 97% less per token than Gemini 3.5 Flash. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window than Gemini 3.5 Flash. Gemini 3.5 Flash offers a cheaper cached-input tier for repeated context.
| Field | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Context window | 1M | 10M |
| Max output | 65.5K | — |
| Input / 1M | $1.50 | $0.1093% cheaper |
| Output / 1M | $9.00 | $0.3097% cheaper |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.15 | — |
| Batch discount | 50% | — |
| Release date | — | 2025-04-05 |
Worked cost examples
Estimated monthly cost on three common usage shapes
| Workload | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
Chatbot 800 input / 200 output tokens per request, 100,000 requests/month | $300.00 | $14.00cheaper |
RAG pipeline 6,000 input / 700 output tokens per request, 30,000 requests/month | $459.00 | $24.30cheaper |
Batch summarization 20,000 input / 1,500 output tokens per request, 5,000 requests/month | $217.50 | $12.25cheaper |
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Llama 4 Scout FAQ
- Is Gemini 3.5 Flash cheaper than Llama 4 Scout?
- Gemini 3.5 Flash costs $1.50 per 1M input tokens versus $0.10 for Llama 4 Scout — Llama 4 Scout is 1400% cheaper per input token.
- Which is cheaper for output tokens, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Llama 4 Scout?
- Gemini 3.5 Flash charges $9.00 per 1M output tokens; Llama 4 Scout charges $0.30 per 1M output tokens.
- Which has the larger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Llama 4 Scout?
- Llama 4 Scout does, with a 10,000,000-token context window.
- Do Gemini 3.5 Flash and Llama 4 Scout offer cache pricing?
- Gemini 3.5 Flash discounts cached input to $0.15 per 1M tokens. Llama 4 Scout has no documented cache discount.
Looking for another matchup? See all comparisons.