Comparison
GPT-4o vs Llama 4 Scout
Per input token, Llama 4 Scout runs 96% cheaper than GPT-4o. Output pricing favors Llama 4 Scout, 97% less per token than GPT-4o. Llama 4 Scout accepts more context per request than GPT-4o. GPT-4o also discounts cached input reads.
| Field | GPT-4o Legacy | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Meta |
| Context window | 128K | 10M |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input / 1M | $2.50 | $0.1096% cheaper |
| Output / 1M | $10.00 | $0.3097% cheaper |
| Cached input / 1M | $1.25 | — |
| Batch discount | — | — |
| Release date | — | 2025-04-05 |
Worked cost examples
Estimated monthly cost on three common usage shapes
| Workload | GPT-4o | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
Chatbot 800 input / 200 output tokens per request, 100,000 requests/month | $400.00 | $14.00cheaper |
RAG pipeline 6,000 input / 700 output tokens per request, 30,000 requests/month | $660.00 | $24.30cheaper |
Batch summarization 20,000 input / 1,500 output tokens per request, 5,000 requests/month | $325.00 | $12.25cheaper |
GPT-4o vs Llama 4 Scout FAQ
- Is GPT-4o cheaper than Llama 4 Scout?
- GPT-4o costs $2.50 per 1M input tokens versus $0.10 for Llama 4 Scout — Llama 4 Scout is 2400% cheaper per input token.
- Which is cheaper for output tokens, GPT-4o or Llama 4 Scout?
- GPT-4o charges $10.00 per 1M output tokens; Llama 4 Scout charges $0.30 per 1M output tokens.
- Which has the larger context window, GPT-4o or Llama 4 Scout?
- Llama 4 Scout does, with a 10,000,000-token context window.
- Do GPT-4o and Llama 4 Scout offer cache pricing?
- GPT-4o discounts cached input to $1.25 per 1M tokens. Llama 4 Scout has no documented cache discount.
Looking for another matchup? See all comparisons.