Comparison
GPT-5.4 mini vs Llama 4 Scout
GPT-5.4 mini charges 87% more per input token than Llama 4 Scout. On generated (output) tokens, GPT-5.4 mini costs 93% more than Llama 4 Scout. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window than GPT-5.4 mini. GPT-5.4 mini offers a cheaper cached-input tier for repeated context.
| Field | GPT-5.4 mini | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Meta |
| Context window | 400K | 10M |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input / 1M | $0.75 | $0.1087% cheaper |
| Output / 1M | $4.50 | $0.3093% cheaper |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.075 | — |
| Batch discount | 50% | — |
| Release date | 2026-03-17 | 2025-04-05 |
Worked cost examples
Estimated monthly cost on three common usage shapes
| Workload | GPT-5.4 mini | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
Chatbot 800 input / 200 output tokens per request, 100,000 requests/month | $150.00 | $14.00cheaper |
RAG pipeline 6,000 input / 700 output tokens per request, 30,000 requests/month | $229.50 | $24.30cheaper |
Batch summarization 20,000 input / 1,500 output tokens per request, 5,000 requests/month | $108.75 | $12.25cheaper |
GPT-5.4 mini vs Llama 4 Scout FAQ
- Is GPT-5.4 mini cheaper than Llama 4 Scout?
- GPT-5.4 mini costs $0.75 per 1M input tokens versus $0.10 for Llama 4 Scout — Llama 4 Scout is 650% cheaper per input token.
- Which is cheaper for output tokens, GPT-5.4 mini or Llama 4 Scout?
- GPT-5.4 mini charges $4.50 per 1M output tokens; Llama 4 Scout charges $0.30 per 1M output tokens.
- Which has the larger context window, GPT-5.4 mini or Llama 4 Scout?
- Llama 4 Scout does, with a 10,000,000-token context window.
- Do GPT-5.4 mini and Llama 4 Scout offer cache pricing?
- GPT-5.4 mini discounts cached input to $0.075 per 1M tokens. Llama 4 Scout has no documented cache discount.
Looking for another matchup? See all comparisons.