Comparison
GPT-5.5 vs Llama 4 Scout
Per input token, Llama 4 Scout runs 98% cheaper than GPT-5.5. Llama 4 Scout is 99% cheaper on output tokens. Llama 4 Scout accepts more context per request than GPT-5.5. GPT-5.5 also discounts cached input reads.
| Field | GPT-5.5 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Meta |
| Context window | 1.1M | 10M |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input / 1M | $5.00 | $0.1098% cheaper |
| Output / 1M | $30.00 | $0.3099% cheaper |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.50 | — |
| Batch discount | 50% | — |
| Release date | 2026-04-23 | 2025-04-05 |
Worked cost examples
Estimated monthly cost on three common usage shapes
| Workload | GPT-5.5 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
Chatbot 800 input / 200 output tokens per request, 100,000 requests/month | $1,000 | $14.00cheaper |
RAG pipeline 6,000 input / 700 output tokens per request, 30,000 requests/month | $1,530 | $24.30cheaper |
Batch summarization 20,000 input / 1,500 output tokens per request, 5,000 requests/month | $725.00 | $12.25cheaper |
GPT-5.5 vs Llama 4 Scout FAQ
- Is GPT-5.5 cheaper than Llama 4 Scout?
- GPT-5.5 costs $5.00 per 1M input tokens versus $0.10 for Llama 4 Scout — Llama 4 Scout is 4900% cheaper per input token.
- Which is cheaper for output tokens, GPT-5.5 or Llama 4 Scout?
- GPT-5.5 charges $30.00 per 1M output tokens; Llama 4 Scout charges $0.30 per 1M output tokens.
- Which has the larger context window, GPT-5.5 or Llama 4 Scout?
- Llama 4 Scout does, with a 10,000,000-token context window.
- Do GPT-5.5 and Llama 4 Scout offer cache pricing?
- GPT-5.5 discounts cached input to $0.50 per 1M tokens. Llama 4 Scout has no documented cache discount.
Looking for another matchup? See all comparisons.