Comparison

Grok 4.3 vs Llama 4 Maverick

Grok 4.3 charges 88% more per input token than Llama 4 Maverick. Output pricing favors Llama 4 Maverick, 76% less per token than Grok 4.3. Grok 4.3 offers a cheaper cached-input tier for repeated context.

FieldGrok 4.3
Llama 4 Maverick
ProviderxAIMeta
Context window1M1M
Max output
Input / 1M$1.25$0.1588% cheaper
Output / 1M$2.50$0.6076% cheaper
Cached input / 1M$0.20
Batch discount
Release date

Worked cost examples

Estimated monthly cost on three common usage shapes

WorkloadGrok 4.3Llama 4 Maverick

Chatbot

800 input / 200 output tokens per request, 100,000 requests/month

$150.00$24.00cheaper

RAG pipeline

6,000 input / 700 output tokens per request, 30,000 requests/month

$277.50$39.60cheaper

Batch summarization

20,000 input / 1,500 output tokens per request, 5,000 requests/month

$143.75$19.50cheaper

Grok 4.3 vs Llama 4 Maverick FAQ

Is Grok 4.3 cheaper than Llama 4 Maverick?
Grok 4.3 costs $1.25 per 1M input tokens versus $0.15 for Llama 4 Maverick — Llama 4 Maverick is 733% cheaper per input token.
Which is cheaper for output tokens, Grok 4.3 or Llama 4 Maverick?
Grok 4.3 charges $2.50 per 1M output tokens; Llama 4 Maverick charges $0.60 per 1M output tokens.
Which has the larger context window, Grok 4.3 or Llama 4 Maverick?
Grok 4.3 does, with a 1,000,000-token context window.
Do Grok 4.3 and Llama 4 Maverick offer cache pricing?
Grok 4.3 discounts cached input to $0.20 per 1M tokens. Llama 4 Maverick has no documented cache discount.

Looking for another matchup? See all comparisons.