Comparison
Grok 4.3 vs Llama 4 Scout
Llama 4 Scout costs 92% less per input token than Grok 4.3. On generated (output) tokens, Grok 4.3 costs 88% more than Llama 4 Scout. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window than Grok 4.3. Grok 4.3 offers a cheaper cached-input tier for repeated context.
| Field | Grok 4.3 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Meta |
| Context window | 1M | 10M |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input / 1M | $1.25 | $0.1092% cheaper |
| Output / 1M | $2.50 | $0.3088% cheaper |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.20 | — |
| Batch discount | — | — |
| Release date | — | 2025-04-05 |
Worked cost examples
Estimated monthly cost on three common usage shapes
| Workload | Grok 4.3 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
Chatbot 800 input / 200 output tokens per request, 100,000 requests/month | $150.00 | $14.00cheaper |
RAG pipeline 6,000 input / 700 output tokens per request, 30,000 requests/month | $277.50 | $24.30cheaper |
Batch summarization 20,000 input / 1,500 output tokens per request, 5,000 requests/month | $143.75 | $12.25cheaper |
Grok 4.3 vs Llama 4 Scout FAQ
- Is Grok 4.3 cheaper than Llama 4 Scout?
- Grok 4.3 costs $1.25 per 1M input tokens versus $0.10 for Llama 4 Scout — Llama 4 Scout is 1150% cheaper per input token.
- Which is cheaper for output tokens, Grok 4.3 or Llama 4 Scout?
- Grok 4.3 charges $2.50 per 1M output tokens; Llama 4 Scout charges $0.30 per 1M output tokens.
- Which has the larger context window, Grok 4.3 or Llama 4 Scout?
- Llama 4 Scout does, with a 10,000,000-token context window.
- Do Grok 4.3 and Llama 4 Scout offer cache pricing?
- Grok 4.3 discounts cached input to $0.20 per 1M tokens. Llama 4 Scout has no documented cache discount.
Looking for another matchup? See all comparisons.