Comparison
Llama 4 Maverick vs Llama 4 Scout
Llama 4 Scout costs 33% less per input token than Llama 4 Maverick. Output pricing favors Llama 4 Scout, 50% less per token than Llama 4 Maverick. Llama 4 Scout accepts more context per request than Llama 4 Maverick.
| Field | Llama 4 Maverick | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Meta |
| Context window | 1M | 10M |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input / 1M | $0.15 | $0.1033% cheaper |
| Output / 1M | $0.60 | $0.3050% cheaper |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — |
| Batch discount | — | — |
| Release date | — | 2025-04-05 |
Worked cost examples
Estimated monthly cost on three common usage shapes
| Workload | Llama 4 Maverick | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
Chatbot 800 input / 200 output tokens per request, 100,000 requests/month | $24.00 | $14.00cheaper |
RAG pipeline 6,000 input / 700 output tokens per request, 30,000 requests/month | $39.60 | $24.30cheaper |
Batch summarization 20,000 input / 1,500 output tokens per request, 5,000 requests/month | $19.50 | $12.25cheaper |
Llama 4 Maverick vs Llama 4 Scout FAQ
- Is Llama 4 Maverick cheaper than Llama 4 Scout?
- Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.15 per 1M input tokens versus $0.10 for Llama 4 Scout — Llama 4 Scout is 50% cheaper per input token.
- Which is cheaper for output tokens, Llama 4 Maverick or Llama 4 Scout?
- Llama 4 Maverick charges $0.60 per 1M output tokens; Llama 4 Scout charges $0.30 per 1M output tokens.
- Which has the larger context window, Llama 4 Maverick or Llama 4 Scout?
- Llama 4 Scout does, with a 10,000,000-token context window.
- Do Llama 4 Maverick and Llama 4 Scout offer cache pricing?
- Llama 4 Maverick has no documented cache discount. Llama 4 Scout has no documented cache discount.
Looking for another matchup? See all comparisons.